Category: church

Teetotal Legalism

Teetotal Legalism

This morning, during the midst of jury duty discussion, I mentioned at work that I’d not have a problem with a law banning alcoholic drinks.  Others in the conversation were a mix of Believers and non-Believers.  After the converstaion ended (shortly after my mostly tongue-in-cheek comment), I was accused of legalism and “not doing the Gospel any good” with my remark.  Both interesting claims.  Let’s dig in.

Read More Read More

What a Naive Lyric

What a Naive Lyric

In all genres of music, there are some really inane lyrics.  Derek Webb, regarded by some as the poster child for insightful lyrics, recently released a song called “My Enemies Are Men Like Me.”  While I like the overall statement of the song, I think, the line below aggravates me beyond description:

peace by way of war is like purity by way of fornication
it’s like telling someone murder is wrong and then showing them by way of execution

Those two lines make two erroneous assertions, in my opinion:  that war is always wrong, and the capital punishment is never justified.

Read More Read More

First Century Emails

First Century Emails

Chris is a friend of mine from church. For good or ill, our senses of humor run along the same lines in many ways. What you’ll see below is an email exchange he and I had in regard to a ticket to our church’s annual Men’s Dinner, written in lofty language and following the pattern we see in the Pauline epistles. It’s good stuff. I’ve added a few links to help explain some of the “inside” humor. Enjoy! πŸ™‚

The Righteous Reverend Jason Lee,

Greetings in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

I have heard, through Senator Hobbs, that you are on the mend from surgery. I pray that God’s healing will come swiftly to your body.

I wanted to ask if you had any interest in attending the Men’s Dinner this Thursday at 6:30 p.m. I have purchased a couple of tables for the purpose of recruiting single men, and I have been mostly successful. However, I have a few tickets remaining.

Would you be interesting in coming? I’m even offering a $1 discount from the regular $10 rate, and I promise the quality of fellowship will be sensational or I’ll give you your money back!

Let me know if you’d like to come,

Chris


Greetings brother. Your fellow bond servant in Christ salutes you. I am humbled that you have taken an interest in the well being of your lowly brother, and cherish the inquiry. I am, indeed, faring well, as God has been kind to hold me in His strong right hand and work a healing upon my form. Many thanks be to our Heavenly Father for His innumerable mercies. Amen.

Brother, I am more than happy to avail myself of one of your remaining tickets to the Men’s Dinner this Thursday evening. I look forward to our repast with much anticipation, and fully expect that the fellowship and breaking of bread to be a boon to body, mind, and spirit. Thank you for your generous offer. I shall recompense you this evening, should you be able to join us for the teaching of our Father’s Word. Should you be unable to join us, I shall be sure to bring adequate funds for you Thursday evening.

Dear brother in Christ, I must now close this brief missive and attend to the work in which our Lord has placed me. May the Father shower you with mercies this day as you labor and travel. Hold fast to the Faith. Greet the brothers with a holy karip. Amen.


Jason


An excellent pontification you penned in your response, dear brother! Your amanuensis represents you well.

I am filled with exceeding great joy that you have accepted my offer and that you will be gracing us with your presence tomorrow evening.

Alas, I do regret that I will miss the gathering of believers to heed the apostles’ teaching this evening. But I will be ministering unto the commoners who come in mass to witness the battle being displayed by the Hornets and the Sonics in the great coliseum known as the Ford Center.

I praise God for the opportunity of fellowship we will share Thursday evening. May all our fellow saints who come be edified and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ receive much glory.

I will look diligently for your presence tomorrow evening. I know you don’t see the large letters I write for I have been graciously allowed to key my response.

The Lord bless you and give you perfect peace!

The Wall of Separation Canard

The Wall of Separation Canard

One of the greatest canards in modern public life, in my opinion, is the alleged "wall of separation" between church and state. The idea is that The Framers wanted a government devoid of any religion at all. I think history adequately shows, though, that that’s not the case. What they wanted, rather, was a religion without a state government. That is to say, they didn’t want any one religion to gain the official backing of the government of the land and then be forced upon the populace, as was the case in England.

Everyone now and then, like this case, we see this faulty idea of separation applied at the local level. I think the people that do this are either uninformed with regards to the Constitution, or are being intentionally disingenuous. While these people bow at the altar of the First Amendment, they gloss over the 10th Amendment, which states that any powers not expressly granted to the Federal government are reserved for the states and the people. So how is this relevant to the South Carolina case? The First Amendment says this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Note the emphasis I added. "Congress shall make no law…" Now, couple that with the Tenth Amendment, and I think you can make a case that the First Amendment does not apply to local governments. If a municipality, acting according to the dictates of its constituents, decide that they wish to acknowledge Jesus Christ in their town hall meetings, I think the Constitution grants them that right. The same goes for Allah, Buddha, or whatever religious figure one might choose. What we have in this case is the tyranny of the minority, where a single person was able to assert her will and overrule what is apparently (from the lack of widespread support of the plaintiff) the will of the local community. If you add in a Supreme Court that seems to have forgotten the Constitution they’ve sworn to interpret and uphold, and you have the federal trampling of states’ rights. Just one more in a long line.

Christians are different, right?

Christians are different, right?

One of the things you hear preached is that Christ changes a person from the inside out, and I believe that to be true. In my own life, I can see the change being made, little by little. That change, though, is not wrought solely by the work of the Spirit. There has to be a decision made on the part of the Believer that he *wants* to be different. Sadly, we see many Christians who have either not made that decision, or have long since given up on it. To be fair, it’s a *hard* life. Whoever thinks that Christianity is for the weak needs to take a closer look at the faith, but I digress.

What makes me ask this question, are Christians truly different, is a discussion I was party to after Sunday School one SUnday morning. One of the ladies in my class commented on the length (or lack thereof) of the skirts and shirts in church (how’s that for quasi-assonance? :). Our (some would charge delicate) sensibilities were a little put off by the amout of skin that even Christian teens were showing. As we were lamenting this problem, a perfect example walked by: a skirt so short that bending over in public would not be decent.

While I realize that style of clothing is currently en vogue, we are called to a higher standard, and I need to be completely fair about this. This idea of setting ourselves apart a la Romans 12:1-2 applies to *every* area of our lives, public and private. Just as much as the racy dress of our youth is sending a bad message is the Christian body’s acceptance of smoking, excessive drinking, profane and immoral music and cinema, etc. We should strive to set ourselves apart from the culture’s decadence as part of our surrender of our lives to the high calling of Christ.

Now, don’t get me wrong. Being different for its own sake is pretty foolish (if blue is popular, wearing nothing but red proves nothing), and personal freedom is far too complex to boil down to my miniscule missive completely, so there are many factors to consider when pondering the point I’m trying to make. Take alcohol, for example. Personally, I don’t have much of a problem with it. If a Christian is a recovering or struggling alcoholic, he should probalby avoid it. In the words of Ted Kirkpatrick, "Just because it causes you to fall don’t [sic] mean it tempts me very much at all." However, since there are those who may stumble if they see me imbibing a "potent potable," I choose not too (see Paul’s discussion of meat sacrificed to idols in I Cor 8).

If we are to show that Christ’s indwelling is efficacious, if we are to show that Christianity is not a farce, then we *must* allow Christ to reign in all areas of our life: our clothing, our music, our movies and television, our dietary habits, etc. I don’t want this to sound like a call to legalism; I think legalism is a weed that chokes the life of out of the abundant life that Chirst brings. However, just because we are *free* to do something, does not mean that we *should* do something. The world needs to see that Christ does indeed change a man. Let’s get out of the way and let sanctification have its way.