Category: pro-life

Song Review: I Was Gonna Be

Song Review: I Was Gonna Be

There is a new (at least to me) artist who has released what some have dubbed the most pro-life song ever. I think Seventh Angel might like to have a word, but my point is not quibble over that point; I’d like to help spread this song around, because it’s pretty awesome. I do have some slight issues with the song, but we’ll get to that at the end.

The song is “I Was Gonna Be” by Rachel Holt. It’s a country song, which is not my favorite genre, but I found the song to be musically pretty enjoyable, the imagery in the video really powerful, and — the most important part — the lyrics, in the words of Michael Knowles — very arresting. Listen to the song (and watch the video). I’ll have the lyrics underneath.

I Was Gonna Be — Rachel Holt

Here are the lyrics:

Some don’t believe I’m a livin’ soul
Just a bad mistake that needs to go
If my momma could’ve just seen my face
Then maybe she would’ve had me anyway

And there are those who speak for me
Who fight for lives that they can’t see
But there are some who only mourn
This life of mine if I were born

And all I wanted was a chance
To learn to love, and laugh, and dance
Oh, but I was gone before I arrived
Sent back to Heaven on a starlight flight
Yeah, I was gonna change the world
And I was gonna be a girl

First thing I was gonna do
Was breathe and fall in love with you
But a couple of weeks before I saw the light
Mine flickered out when you changed your mind

And all I wanted was a chance
To learn to love, and laugh, and dance
Oh, but I was gone before I arrived
Sent back to Heaven on a starlight flight
I was gonna have some pretty curls
And I was gonna be a girl

I’m more than just some one-night stand
Or some burden that you think I am
And there ain’t no man who’s ever gonna be
What I was gonna be

Some don’t believe I’m a livin’ soul
Just a bad mistake that needs to go

https://www.rockol.com/uk/lyrics-290727997/rachel-holt-i-was-gonna-be

Overall, I think this is a fantastic song. It paints such a poignant picture of the cost of abortion from the aborted’s perspective. Just amazing. Those words, sung with the pretty soprano and the gentle instruments, are just incredible.

I do have two little nits to pick, though. The first is the line “Sent back to Heaven on a starlight flight”. This is a minor point, but we don’t start in Heaven first, then become humans. We come into existence at conception, an amazing and enduring act of creation still happening today that I’m not sure we fully appreciate. That said, it’s a minor thing, and I get the poetic aspect of the line, so … meh. 🙂

The other issue is a bit more serious: “I was gonna be a girl” While this may seem like splitting hairs, it’s not: “she” wasn’t going to be a girl. She was a girl. One of the pro-life arguments is that life begins at conception (there’s really no other place life can start, logically or rationally, but more on that another time). If that’s true (and it is ;), then “she” was already a girl, even if she didn’t look like one, or was still in her mother’s womb. She was a little girl from the moment of conception until her untimely death at the hands of Dr. Hatchet.

This girl, of course, is fictional, but she’s representative of thousands of real little girls (and boys) who are murdered every day for, more often than not, reasons as sad and mundane as concerns over careers. Of course, women who are considering abortion (or who have had abortions) need our care and compassion, but so do the young lives in their wombs who are so very dependent on the adults around the mother considering such a fatal decision.

Give the song a listen. I hope it changes someone’s mind.

Obama and Stem Cells

Obama and Stem Cells

Today, President Obama rescinded President Bush’s ban on federal funding for expanded embryonic stem cell research. Adam Keiper, in a post on The Corner, made some really interesting points regarding the policy shift. One of the most interesting parts of the analysis was this question that Keiper asks of the President:

What counts as a purely “scientific decision”? What issues can we possibly decide on scientific grounds alone — that is, without also inquiring after the kinds of important ethical, political, and economic concerns that President Obama denigrates as mere “ideology”? On what future issues will the president claim that science dictates a policy and trumps all other concerns?

If we’re not going to let ideology play a role in determining what happens in the name of science, why not allow unrestrained animal — or even human — testing? Is vivisection on the table then (no pun intended)? History has clearly shown that restraints must be put in place, or some very cruel, and, yes, evil people will push that laissez faire attitude as far as they can. If Obama envisions a scientific world untethered by any sort of ideology, whence comes morality in some respects, then he’s opening a Pandora’s Box that we will rue for decades.

Stem cells can cure a lot of things, just not the stem cells the President is pushing. Given the success of adult stem cells and the resounding lack of success of embryonic stem cells, the President’s decision is anything but non-ideological. It’s misguided, deluded, and infanticidal.

What does change under Obama mean?

What does change under Obama mean?

Why, more abortions, of course! But we’re not supposed to focus on that, right? We’re supposed to worry about the economy and things like that. Worry about people losing their jobs, not defenseless babies being ripped apart in utero! If he had a pastor, I bet he’d be proud…

By the way…

By the way…

I don’t think I’ve mentioned this, but, along with some friends of mine, I’ve been blogging for a while over at Pilgrim’s Progress.  We try to restrict our discussions to pro-life discussions, the intersection of public policy and faith, and similar matters.  If that sounds at all appealing, feel free to check out and subscribe to our feed. 🙂

A Great Anti-Abortion Story

A Great Anti-Abortion Story

While there’s nothing explicitly pro-life about this story, I love how the doctors suggested abortion (Hippocrates must be spinning in his grave), but the mother refused and it ended up saving her life. It reminds me of this heartbreaking story. A mother refuses to terminate her pregnancy or start chemo for her liver cancer, saying, “If I am going to die, my baby is going to live.” A truly awful outcome for the mother, but what a beautiful picture of love and self-sacrifice. “Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends.”

Unborn Activists?

Unborn Activists?

Here is a pretty interesting article on abortion.  It takes a pretty different perspective to the issue, that of waging the pro-life battle from the perspective of the unborn (possibly aborted) child.  It sounds a bit weird, but it’s a pretty compelling piece.

Read More Read More